Originally Posted by Guest

Dear OP

Let me begin by stating application of moral equivalency is not the way I would analyze or judge a situation. Good or bad and moral equivalency is usually applied to bad is a wasted exercise. A person's actions should be based solely on what that person did or did not do. Moral equivalency's intent is obvious...Nice try for Hillary but if you had to try why didn't you compare her to the actions of Charlie Rangel or Terry McAuliffe?

I would like to thank the poster who provided the link to fact checked. It has lost its credibility with me.

Trump was accused of exaggerations Quite possible indeed because he is full of himself.

Hillary's alleged malfesance go quit farther. We now know thankful from Wikileak that Trump was right in reinforcing Sanders claims that the system was rigged for Hillary. further Wikileak provided proof that the Democrats orchestrated the so called protests against Trump. These protests could have gotten out of hand and resulted in serious consequences

Personal Best Regards: