This will also turn out to be nothing but a waste of time. The bottom line in my opinion is to ask yourself, "Why was the Clinton Foundation organized? And how do they handle donations?"

Fiorina isn’t the only one making this charge about the Clinton Foundation. Fox Business Network’s Gerri Willis, for example, also claimed only 6 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s 2013 revenue “went to help people.”

"We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.6 million in reported expenses."

So what is it? 6% or 88%? How could these 2 numbers be so far apart? Why bother going in the charity business? Everything is political.

Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?