Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
THE FACTS-you will not see this put together in the press.
Obama got 56% of the vote in his first election. He was young, he was unknown HE HID MOST OF HIS PAST. Had the VOTERS done their reading they would have found people like ARES, WRIGHT,FARACAN. What every you think,
Obama's qualification to PROVE he was a BORN CITIZEN is debatable. SHOULD THIS HAVE NOT BEEN SETTLED BEFORE HE WAS ALLOWED TO RUN?
Blacks are 13% of the population and Obama got 98% of the black vote. No matter how you choose to bend FACTS how could that not be considered RACIST. Reminder Obama got 56% of the vote. To do that Obama got, fuzzy math, about 42% of the non black vote.
HAD THE NON-BLACK VOTE BEEN AS RACIST AS THE BLACK VOTE OBAMA WOULD HAVE GOTTEN ROUGHLY 28% OF THE VOTE-THE WORST DEFEAT IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
|
Sorry to make you look so ignorant, but blacks have almost ALWAYS voted Dem...so Obama's TWO TERMS were no different.
You can whine all you want, but you have to be a special kind of ignorant to think that blacks don't know who has the least amount of prejudice against them.
Racism, in and of itself, doesn't really matter if the racist doesn't have some type of control over the demographic they are racist towards.
This country is still overwhelmingly controlled by white males, which is why racism from them.... is so much worse than from a demographic comprised of 12%.
It's fun (in a disgusting way) watching all of the white males here, some who probably had hiring/firing authority in their working life...scream about black racism.
The flaming hypocrisy couldn't be any hotter.
CNM