Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Have you ever heard of "past precedent" or do you just disregard it, except when it's to your advantage.
|
There is no law requiring pubic disclosure of his tax return, period. So, you have no argument. What someone else does is what they wished to do and not something required of you. Your "past precedent" is hardly a valid argument. The past precedent would dictate NO WOMEN in the presidency. The past precedent would dictate NO BLACKS in the presidency.
Did I explain it in simple enough terms for your understanding?