Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I'm sorry but I have argued this with you libtards over and over again. Go back an read some other posts because knowing your type, lazy you won't bother and even when I provided proof such as Dodd/Frank, etc. you still denied it. On the other hand, you blame Bush who has NOTHING to do with the money, just as you said about Obama. Go back and look at what Clinton was responsible for. How many times did Bush ask for an audit of Fanny and Freddy and was turned down by Barney Frank? Yep, and what eventually happened?
So, go back to your hole or do some of your own research. Every time I dig up the information, I get the same lame cr@p from you libtards
The Republicans lost control of congress two years from Bush's end of his second term. What was employment and the economy like before that? Great, right? Economists said it was considered FULL EMPLOYMENT.
Now, Obama brags about his low unemployment but forgets about the record high amount of folks of working age that have quit or are not in the working force Something like one of three working aged adults over 16 years old. 45 million STILL on food stamps, a historic number. In this administration we have never achieved a 3% GDP growth, the first time in history. The first president not have achieved 3% during his two terms.
So instead of making excuses for your messiah, you might want to face reality. Hillary said she will continue the same And you know what? Hillary is soooo lazy, she will.
|
Why didn't you come out of your rat hole, when republicans here made totally stupid beyond belief statements about the cause of the great recession? Someone even praised the stupid statement, but you keep your mouth shut. Didn't you!
Whatever you post can not be questioned, because what you are the almighty, and can do no wrong?
http://democrats.financialservices.h...e_timeline.pdf
Isn't that great there was full employment in "W's" first six years? As soon as the Democrats gained control everything changed.
What did the Democrats do in those two years that caused the collapse? As soon as, the Democrats took control "W" saw the light of day, and started asking for audits of Freddie, and Fanny. Is that what you are trying sell?
You know what "W" was handed a balanced budget. What happened to that, unfunded wars, and a large cut tax most of which went to the wealthy. What did he pass on? The Great Recession.
You don't think that the Republican Senate filibustering everything contributed to the speed of the recovery? What did the Republicans ever put forward to help the recovery? They were more interested in regaining the White House in 2012 then they were in helping the country get out of the recession.
Dodd/Frank was enacted to prevent another crash like 2007/2008. There was a Consumer Protection Agency set up to overlook Wall Street. They wouldn't approve the person named to head the agency, Elizabeth Warren. That worked out well for the Republicans didn't it? The Republicans are doing everything they can to repeal Dodd/Frank, or they to make it worthless. The Republicans are in bed up to the ears with Wall Street. Hillary might be in bed with them, but she has her legs crossed. She will be going after them, when she is elected president.
What do the Republicans always push, international trade bills that help big business. How many manufacturing jobs have moved overseas due to these trade bills?
When you compare the great recession to others after WWII, you are not comparing like items. The Great Recession as suggested by its name was a lot deeper than others, and road to recovery, manufacturing jobs, was a lot smaller. You are not talking apples and apples.
Figures lie, and liars figures. That is exactly what the Republicans are doing was spouting the current numbers. They are hoping everybody is stupid enough to believe times haven't changed.
First time in history GDP didn't exceed 3% is that right.
• U.S. - Real GDP growth by year 1990-2015
Take a look at the Bush years.