Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Only 'incoherent,' because you once again dodged the question of your prejudice...and obvious acceptance of subsidizing corporations that pay low wages.
Either that, or because you're too busy yelling with caps...you aren't smart enough to comprehend.
So which is it? 
While your suggestions on reducing using those cards for things that they shouldn't be used makes sense in some ways (I admit that I am not that familiar with what they can/cannot use them for), you have once again only addressed your stereotype of what you think is the average 'welfare recipient.'
So why don't you show us (with some type of legitimate statistical, not opinion, link) what % of those receiving public assistance, fits into that stereotypical 'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc.' category of yours?
Is it 75%?
50%?
25%?
Less than 10%?
And then what % of those getting that assistance, are actually part of the working poor?
Or are you afraid that it might burst YOUR little bubble of ignorance and prejudice? 
LOL 
You haven't 'busted' anything of mine, you've simply reinforced my viewpoint that ignorant and nasty people like you and your ilk will develop whatever prejudices necessary...to reinforce your own anger and hatred.
BTW - Aren't you the same (hard to tell, since all you 'guests' sound alike...LOL) jerk who tried to lecture me about leveling 'personal attacks?'
And yet, you were the first to do it in your other post.
Like I've said many times, you flaming hypocrites...crack me the hell up.
Thanks for the guffaws. 
CNM |
I didn't think it was possible, but you've outdone yourself this time.
First of all, I am hardly prejudiced. Let me walk that back, I have a "work ethic" prejudice. I have no use for anyone who feels they are "entitled" to sit on their a$$ and reap the benefit of other people efforts.
As far as "subsidizing corporations that pay low wages", employers will pay a wage that gets them the workers they need, driven by market forces. Again, go back to economics 101. If buying their product is a "subsidy", it is what it is. If your argument is that low wage workers still qualify for welfare and I subsidize that by taxes, that is a construct of the government YOU elected, not the corporation.
And I would love to know, and share with you statistics on the demographics of welfare recipients, but they do not publish how many "'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc." are getting taxpayer funds. It doesn't matter, because one is one too many. Again, I have no problem with those who work hard but still need help.
And, no, I am not the one who lectured about personal attacks. There is no need, since I long ago acknowledged that all the "flaming" hypocrites reside on the left, and when confronted with facts and logic all they can do is resort to name calling. As proof, see the post that referred to a "big meanie". Has anyone ever used that term past 3rd grade? Well, I guess at least one person has, assuming they are not a 3rd grader.
Lastly, is the term "flaming" some sort of slur against homosexuals? Given the DNC e-mails, that would be completely in line with liberal thinking.