Originally Posted by Guest

I didn't think it was possible, but you've outdone yourself this time.

First of all, I am hardly prejudiced. Let me walk that back, I have a "work ethic" prejudice. I have no use for anyone who feels they are "entitled" to sit on their a$$ and reap the benefit of other people efforts.

As far as "subsidizing corporations that pay low wages", employers will pay a wage that gets them the workers they need, driven by market forces. Again, go back to economics 101. If buying their product is a "subsidy", it is what it is. If your argument is that low wage workers still qualify for welfare and I subsidize that by taxes, that is a construct of the government YOU elected, not the corporation.

And I would love to know, and share with you statistics on the demographics of welfare recipients, but they do not publish how many "'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc." are getting taxpayer funds. It doesn't matter, because one is one too many. Again, I have no problem with those who work hard but still need help.

And, no, I am not the one who lectured about personal attacks. There is no need, since I long ago acknowledged that all the "flaming" hypocrites reside on the left, and when confronted with facts and logic all they can do is resort to name calling. As proof, see the post that referred to a "big meanie". Has anyone ever used that term past 3rd grade? Well, I guess at least one person has, assuming they are not a 3rd grader.

Lastly, is the term "flaming" some sort of slur against homosexuals? Given the DNC e-mails, that would be completely in line with liberal thinking.