Quote:
Originally Posted by Mleeja
Please don't take my original post as negative. If there are sufficient users to support an indoor pool that is great. It is just something that does not appeal to me. I just think this should be a user fee based facility. Even if the fees just cover the variable operating cost.
|
I join in your concern. There already a sufficient number of pools. Priority membership paves the way for private use of certain pools. Likewise I would hope that residents do not get stuck with paying for this indoor pool. Let's hope it's construction and operating costs are paid by those you desire its use.
I intend to e-mail Jane Tutt and voice my compliments for providing this opportunity but also that I hope its with someone else's money and not mine. I already pay for amenities I don't use or want