Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Is it not amusing how some can talk about a person as if they know him.
Their only source of knowledge of the person is what they know from the television....most media driven...and we know that is 100% biased....but still does not = knowing.
Maybe some read?....Emphasis on read.....stil does not = knowing.
The loyalist dems and radical dems source and direction from the party directives telling them what to say. Still does not = knowing.
And we all know what they say about opinions. Everybody has one.....absolutely does not = knowing.
More parroting than knowing is the basis of most of the content of this forum........however, some speak as though they are first hand informed/knowlegeable.....still does not = knowing.....no matter how the picture is painted.
|
Bingo! It's the OPPOSITE of knowing. It's like reading an autobiography...full of lies and exaggerations.
If people had read Os books they'd never have elected him.
People don't really know anything about "their" candidate. I do, that's why I refuse to vote for any of the D or R crooks. The Donald will disappoint too if he's elected. The game is fixed...