Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
BINGO! 
The Queen 'B' isn't bright enough to figure out the hypocrisy in her post. 
As to the person who wrote the ignorant nonsense about wages and women in the workforce, I guess they don't realize that about 70% of our economy is based on consumer consumption.
US GDP is 70 Percent Personal Consumption: Inside the Numbers | Mic
double every 1; years
Anyone with half a brain can understand that the two-person working family, has more income and is therefore a bigger driver of our economy.
Stating that wages would be as much as 50% higher had only males stayed in the workforce, is about as dumb as one can get.
What next, go back to women being basically chattel? 
And while having the ability to keep one person home with children (even if they weren't forced to due to personal issues  ) is good for some, providing a better lifestyle and standard of living for your family is also good for some.
At least women (like my wife) now have that choice...which wasn't available to previous generations of females.
Seeing ANY woman complain about 'Women's Liberation' not only astounds me, but also tells me that she isn't that smart...regardless of what education she may have. 
CNM |
Read the entire post. . Wages have stagnated because of the lack of growth. Under Obama we have less than 2% growth. In order for wages to grow in any meaningful way we need 4% growth but this will not happen on the Obama and it won't happen if Hillary is elected, considering the high taxes placed on small and large businesses and regulation after
regulation. The las 8 years were disasterous. If you want more of the same then vote for Hillary. It's that simple really