Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw
If they did not have Duke's permission to do the extensive upgrades (and it appears that they didn't), I'm amazed at their arrogance and disregard of property rights. All I can figure is that someone in this group thought if they spent a period of time maintaining the property, they could claim in the future that they have access across the property through adverse possession. I believe the obvious liability issue along with the adverse possession issue is why Duke has acted.
|
Maybe Duke put the sign up to protect against liability. If they really want to block cart traffic, a sign won't work.