Despite being surrounded by scandals and controversies, Hillary Clinton hasn’t answered a question from the press in about a month. That’s because after the issues involving her campaign tours with staged audiences, she doesn’t want to continue the embarrassment. And the adoring liberal press is willing to let her get away with it.

Thankfully, the federal courts aren’t biased. That’s why a federal judge has agreed to reopen a lawsuit that seeks to gain access to emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, which was wiped clean.

Judge Reggie B. Walton’s decision against the State Department, supported a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch. The judge agreed that the documents that Clinton kept on her own email server separate from the government should be turned over.


The FBI has sent to Capitol Hill the records of her interview with the agency. Clinton campaign officials now worry that her opponents will leak selected portions of those findings.

Meanwhile, as part of an ongoing public records lawsuit, a federal judge ruled Friday that Clinton must answer under oath written questions from the conservative organization Judicial Watch about the use of the email server. The Clinton campaign sees the lawsuit as right-wing harassment, but the judge’s decision means the email controversy will continue, no doubt through the end of the campaign.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told Fox News on Tuesday that the decision is an “extraordinary development.” He said it could ultimately lead to the department having to “explain itself under oath.”

“This is the first case that’s been reopened,” Fitton told The Washington Times. “It’s a significant development. It points to the fraud by this administration and Mrs. Clinton.”

Previously, the court dismissed Judicial Watch’s request, on the grounds that the documents did not exist.

Judicial Watch is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation that promotes transparency and accountability in government.

Your Hero