Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
To summarize the NY times article. They hired a bunch of title guys to research the Leins on trumps corporate buildings and found mortgages. Wow!
Their own summary
"Though he answered the questions, the form appears to have been designed for candidates with simpler finances than his, and did not require disclosure of portions of his business activities."
Did any of you read trumps financial disclisures? I did, through the eyes of an MBA.
He only had the option to answer "over 50 million" on many questions.
I don't want to comment further about the ridiculous comments made. Do I care about this country, you ask.
I have pledged my allegiance in more ways you can imagine. AND I have researched the candidates. Maybe you should try it.
|
First, understand I am not in anyway pro Clinton, but listening to Trump talk about what Clinton owes in favors etc to others, sort of pales with the allegiance he has to various large banks, both domestic and foreign.
If you read his economic proposals, lay them alongside this, with his total denial on tax returns, ....I don't have an MBA like you, but it is obvious the serious contradictions are blatant.
Laid alongside his lack of morals I have grave concerns as do many who know him well.
Again, I may not be as smart as you, but this is still one gigantic con job.
With your MBA, you surely see the total folly n most, not all, but surely most of his trade proposals.....surely with your MBA, you see he speaks only in platitudes about most things, and in today's world, to profess a foreign policy that reeks of nationalism is not only folly, but unsafe.
All of this, and more, with a history of egoism and immorality..well it is concerning.
Running a country is not the same as running any business. You cannot shoot from the hip....you are counted on to be someone who at least triedps to bring people and countries together, not label by ethnicity if they disagree with you.
Sorry, with all respect to your education, he is a con artist.