Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Nobody ignored the question in anyway.
The question, by its essence and structure was aimed to begin just another slash fest of some kind.
There are two parties, with two very poor candidates.
If the intent was just to slam only one party, then they are the one to be critiqued, not me for actually responding about the GOP really having a need for one AND having it discussed publicly as this morning in the senate. Great fear in the GOP about this idiot.
|
You are entitled to your opinion.
However your staement of the essence of the question is how you chose to view it. As the OP I can tell you there was no such thinking in my question.
Also your allegation of the intent to slam is completely off target.
Is there no way to have a discussion about ANYTHING without the ever present spinning of the subject to always be reduced to a partisan pi$$ing contest.
Based on the usual responses on this forum by some select few, the asnswer is obviously....NO!