Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl
It's Rohan. Not sure just what you are trying to say. I can tell you this..
I am NOT a fan of the POA.
|
Some of use don't have choice above the mason Dixon line.
I guess you don't get the POA news and read the minutes of the meetings. It don't effect you all south of the mason Dixon line yet due to the developer still in charge and owns amenities what I understand? Correct me it I'm wrong?
Basically Ms. Tutt pushing developers property and I think she enlisted MR. ROHAN ( the developer's main man?) which it seems most POA members aren't that interested in that area in district 3 and 4) for the final push. Even though the 8 acres mol around 100k vs 3 mil for 40 acres. Which would be good for district 1 and 2, but does nothing for 3 and 4 IMO.
Rio grande NE of 466. IMO that area has ample ammenties or less lacking than far north. North 466 above Glenview (el Camino Reno). with the expansion of District 4 are and was lacking Amenities IMO and others the live in the far north.