I believe the point that was trying to be made was that all of those states have had the same party leadership for the majority of the past 50 years. And it's the party that claims to be for the little people. However this information would make you wonder that they are really for taking as much as possible from the pockets of the people they claim to be for.
Be a very interesting study to look at all 50 states, rank them by party leadership for the past 50 years, cost of living, debt per capita, taxes, crime, and maybe a few other key quality of life measures and compare the results. Should show how party leadership impacts quality of life for the citizens of each state.
And I honestly don't know the answer to the above question for all states. But I do for those 9 if they are truly indicative.
__________________
Life is to short to drink cheap wine.
|