Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The "unemployment" numbers are bullsh!t too. They took MILLION out of the workforce to make their numbers look good. They also went from good full time jobs to part time.
|
Given that the methodology to determine the unemployment rate changed in 1994...even The Simpleton used the current system to tout his numbers.
Unemployment 7.8% to 22% - Is There A Better Method? | Lance Roberts | FINANCIAL SENSE
Quote:
In 1994, under the Clinton Administration, the Bureau Of Labor Statistics (BLS) changed the methods in which it calculated the levels of unemployment in the U.S. While the changes appeared to be minor on the surface at the time - the impact today is likely far greater than originally imagined. (for more detail on the changes read here)
|
Where do you people get such misinformation?
Is it deliberate lying, or are you just too ignorant to search for the truth?
Oh wait, that was a rhetorical question, given that
Faux News viewers have been shown in multiple studies...
to be the least informed of facts. 
CNM