
09-22-2016, 06:50 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tamarind Grove/Monpazier, France
Posts: 14,708
Thanks: 390
Thanked 2,144 Times in 881 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
Steve and Cajulian: Let's begin with basics. All this discussion hasn't been created by village residents continuing breaches into Stonecrest, Water Oaks, etc. No we have this problem because like Stonecrest the theme was why pay more for the village lifestyle when you can have more with less and still have the village lifestyle.
Second Lets envision a map of The Villages and divide it into two parts both colored. The commercial district is green and the private residential district is red.
Green belongs ( owns, rents, etc) to the Developer and comprises his commercial interests which are open to the public. Green means go and all non-residents are welcomed.
The Red District belongs to residents who purchased a home at a premium, paid a bond and pay a monthly amenity fee which supports amenities such as rec centers, executive golf courses, multi-modal paths, etc.
Residents of Stonecrest ,etc had an equal opportunity to make such a purchase but chose otherwise. It would seem that breaching the red zone is the persistent goal of some residents of Stonecrest, Water Oaks, Spruce Creek, Oxford, etc.
Please don't get mad at us if we object and desire borders because we have and continue to pay our dues. The Villages is expanding at a rapid pace and we do not need additional traffic on our MMP, etc.
Fair is fair
Personal Best Regards:
|
Makes sense to me.
__________________
It's harder to hate close up.
|