Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw
The big mistake was the group that took it upon themselves to "upgrade" the path without the owners permission. IMO, this was an underhanded attempt to claim access via prescriptive easement or implied dedication. Most likely, one of the users concocted this plan, similar to the attempt to force TV to open access through the historic villages based on medical access necessities, and even trying to get national organizations and US representatives involved. Duke recognized this immediately, and thus, the letter of impending closure.
|
How does that saying go:"The road to hell is paved with good intentions." We will just have to see how this plays out. Never know someone may take responsibility. If not I'm sure for the next 10 years there will be threads and threads of complaints. Keeps the Talk of the Villages in business selling advertising.