Originally Posted by Guest

This is indeed a difficult scenario because the media push the need for moral equivalencies between these two nominee's when we should be focusing on substantive issues .

Its unfortunate that we don't get an opportunity for a do over. For those of us who voted differently in the primary it is even more disheartening. In the end voters are not well served or supported with either candidate.

Perhaps like your parents mine taught me to respect women. Indeed for some of us the feminist movement was confusing because we believed what was common courteous such as holding a door open for a lady became an insult to feminist. And so the radical movement moved aggressively ad nauseam.

What Trump did was never considered appropriate but in the age of feminist with their trigger warning of harassment and call for safe spaces what Trump did is viewed now as a major crime.

So now progressives moral equivalent is that what Hillary has done with her personal server, Clinton Foundation and Benghazi, et al is not nearly as bad as Trump flip remarks

In plain English based on the feminist/progressive creed Casanova like sexual intrigue is now labeled as sexual predators. Clearly not every man aspires to be Casanova but the ridiculous restrictions placed on harmless flirting have gone beyond the pale. Once again to be clear Trumps' behavior as described is unacceptable but does it really reach the personal server/Clinton Foundation/Benghazi levels? I think not


Personal Best Regards: