[Johnd]

This is how I ended my first post on this subject.

"The opponents 3 talking points are vague. Point 1 states in part the amendment will “limit customer-owned solar”. Please explain how. Point 2 mentions “barriers that would penalize solar customers”. What barriers? Point 3 is partially correct. The right of solar activists to own or lease solar energy equipment for personal use is already existing law. But the right of ensuring that residents who do not produce solar energy can abstain from subsidizing its production is not presently protected."

Still waiting for the opponents to explain how anyone interested in solar power is "limited" or faces "barriers" from this amendment. Of course, other than the barrier of getting into my pocket to fund your activities.