Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Are you serious. You must be listening Tony he propaganda media if you think Trump has not discussed these at a policy level which any leader knows is where you start. Don't recall any discussion on the left about ther ideas. As far as economics most economists are Dems. Here is what most non political types believe because the down economy has hit them directly. Top Economist Reveals THIS About Donald Trump's Plan, People Deserve to Know |
OK....let me begin by saying linking me to ANGRYPATRIOTMOVEMENT.COM sort of tells me a lot and validates my point made a few times about the use of extremist websites, but anyway......I did read it because I have enough respect for anyone to listen to their point of view.
He is first linked to your site from BRIETBART...which speaks volumes and speaks of Obamacare and continues the carping on Clinton continuing Obama policies. It does NOT detail or discuss any specific policies proposed by either candidate. Thus, I am not sure what you got from it but ...
So.....I choose a few economist sites that I KNOW are conservative.
The first comes from FISCAL TIMES...certainly conservative. They begin the linked article by citing two folks who like the plan a little, not a lot but a little and they offer their grade based on many "maybes" then they go on...
"As it turns out, the effects of Trump’s trade policies are expected to do most of the heavy lifting, adding an estimated $1.74 trillion in additional tax revenue to the US Treasury over the space of 10 years.
The problem is that when economists and international trade experts not affiliated with the Trump campaign started reading it, they were not impressed. “Nonsense,” an economist from the Tax Foundation called it. Another from the CATO Institute tweeted out the hashtag #WeAreAllDoomed. A conservative Canadian financial columnist warned a colleague not even to try reading it, saying, “you will poke your eyes out with hot spikes.”
Commentators took special exception to Navarro’s and Ross’s discussion of the nature of the country’s Gross Domestic Product and its relationship with the trade deficit.
They make this comment on his constant harping on trade....
"While Trump might have the authority to pull the US out of the WTO, he could not unilaterally change the country’s existing tariff laws. However, said Lincicome, US withdrawal “would permit every other trading partner in the world to unilaterally block US exports, unilaterally infringe on US intellectual property.”
You can read it yourself but its headline says it all...
"Conservative Economists Mock Trump Campaign’s Trade Proposals"
Conservative Economists Mock Trump Campaign’s Trade Proposals | The Fiscal Times
Then on to the Wall St Journal...conservative for sure
"A new analysis concludes Donald Trump’s economic proposals, taken at face value, could produce a prolonged recession and heavy job losses that would fall hardest on low- and middle-income workers."
That is how it starts and downhill from there....
U.S. Economy Would Be ‘Diminished’ Under Trump’s Economic Plan, New Analysis Says - Real Time Economics - WSJ
The ECONOMIST....
"Donald Trump’s sums do not add up"
What plan?: Donald Trump’s sums do not add up | The Economist
THUS please do not try and ridicule me on what I read. I read a lot and every day. Trumps plans do change almost daily so you need to stay up on them.
He is speaking in nothing but platitudes to you and his followers.
I choke, as a W Penna guy when I hear how he will save the coal mines and bring back steel production. And none of you question him how in the world he can possible even get close to making something like that happen...IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.