Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
who would this apply to?
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
I think two ladies, names begins with H
ya think
|
In no way would I or will I defend any actions taken by Clinton. If law is broken, then charge her and let the chips fall where they may.
However, the uninformed Holier Than Thou attitude of those who either don't care about our future or are so filled with hate, they would support anyone, sane or not who might oppose her.
I suggest a quick look, because all of you only post anti Clinton (sort of typical of a scam artist to deflect what you look at) and never ever post anything about the serious issues facing this country, or a comparison if them, or what experts say about them...anyway, at minimum a look at
The Making of Donald Trump >> Melville House Books
It is a book p, written by David Cay JOhnston, an investigative reporter.
This is part of the epilouge...
"mobsters and mob associates, a major drug trafficker he went to bat for, and other unsavory characters,” Johnston wrote in his book’s epilogue. "As these pages make clear, Trump’s relationships with criminals were often profitable, sometimes gratuitous, and never properly examined by those whose duty was to investiga"
I get hit on here quite a bit. I am not, never been, nor could be a Clinton supporter or voter.
I simply KNOW that Trump is pulling a con job, and all the pointing of fingers is certainly ironic as his criminal past is certainly much more varied.
I simply ask people to think past Nov 8, because then is when...