Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Legal ?
Thread: Legal ?
View Single Post
 
Old 10-31-2016, 02:55 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
In no way would I or will I defend any actions taken by Clinton. If law is broken, then charge her and let the chips fall where they may.

However, the uninformed Holier Than Thou attitude of those who either don't care about our future or are so filled with hate, they would support anyone, sane or not who might oppose her.

I suggest a quick look, because all of you only post anti Clinton (sort of typical of a scam artist to deflect what you look at) and never ever post anything about the serious issues facing this country, or a comparison if them, or what experts say about them...anyway, at minimum a look at

The Making of Donald Trump >> Melville House Books

It is a book p, written by David Cay JOhnston, an investigative reporter.

This is part of the epilouge...

"mobsters and mob associates, a major drug trafficker he went to bat for, and other unsavory characters,” Johnston wrote in his book’s epilogue. "As these pages make clear, Trump’s relationships with criminals were often profitable, sometimes gratuitous, and never properly examined by those whose duty was to investiga"

I get hit on here quite a bit. I am not, never been, nor could be a Clinton supporter or voter.

I simply KNOW that Trump is pulling a con job, and all the pointing of fingers is certainly ironic as his criminal past is certainly much more varied.

I simply ask people to think past Nov 8, because then is when...
Your side spread the exact same false claims about Reagan . According to your side as soon as Reagan got control of the Nukes he would fire them off within hours of being elected .

Oh he was just far too old , too much of a right-wing nut that the World would end within hours of his swearing in .

So now you have all gone back to the old play-book to get your girl elected at any costs . Hillary is the Saint of unattractive and miserable women everywhere and emasculated young males under age 30 .
Just look at her faked " crowds " at her arranged and fully scripted fake campaign stops .
The vast majority of the people who are for her are " Takers " who want to keep their free Gvt Benefits rolling along [ not speaking of SS or Medicare here ] , have some deep seated issues with men , and have not yet had enough lifer experience because they are too young to have had to support themselves .
It`s a " coalition of the willing to be supported by others " no matter what .