Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You seem to forget the many Muslim men and women who are in our armed forces and our police and especially those who are our allies taking on ISIS.
|
Muslim in name only! A "real" Muslim wouldn't be caught dead in an infidel army. Our Muslim "allies" are ONLY allies when it benefits them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
No I have not. I served in the IC with a number of Muslims. The point that liberals seem incapable of learning is that there are three categories of Muslims. 1) Fundamentalist (i.e. radical), 2) Moderate and 3) Liberal.
The latter reject the core teachings of Islam which is violent to its core, in the manner Muhammad taught it. There are also plenty of Muslim allies ...eg the Kurds, those who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood etc.
The problem with Keith is ... he's closer to the fundamental camp from what I've seen although his outward manifestations are restrained. He has been endorsed by CAIR and, most likely, the MB. That's all we need to know that his head, and heart, are likely in a very bad place for traditional, constitutional America. Islam is essentially an imperial religion and their long term strategy has never waivered in 1,400 years although the tactics adapt, in order to make all men submit to the will of Allah.
|
There's 2...fundamentalist and in name only.
If you reject the teachings...you're not a Muslim...except in name only. Like a Catholic who doesn't follow the rules...you're in name only...a Jew who doesn't follow the rules...in name only.
Islam is a cancer...worse than the other religious cancers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Perhaps. And perhaps many of them still believe in Sharia law. There are many flavors of the Muslim religion and they all do not always get along. I have a very close friend from the military that is Muslim as well as a granddaughter that is married to a Muslim. They still believe in the Koran and they still treat women as lesser beings. Of course, if women wish to subject themselves to their ways, it is up to them.
This country has always been a majority of citizens that have been of Christian religions. I doubt if we will be able to call us America if we allow that to change. After all, if you read all the old documentation from the founders, you will find that they are all based on the foundation of Christian beliefs, even if not regulated by a strict Christian rule. Yes, we have freedom OF religion, but I doubt that founders ever envisioned a time where a radical religion would become so prominent in American lives.
If the Democrats wish to be represented by a Muslim, then that is their prerogative. What's worst, being led by a Muslim or being led by a Communist? Either way, I guess we will find out how corrupted the millennials have become in their radical thinking in the future elections.
|
Muslim in name only..he would NEVER join the infidel army and he wouldn't marry a non-muslim.
in 30 years, we'll be Mexico II and none of this will matter...