Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
1. Trump's picks... Never try to manage from beneath
2. Disclosure of taxes...Again if there were anything even remotely damaging the progressives would have sussed it out and headlined it in every news outlet across the world in the largest font allowable
3. You dismiss out of hand Trump's gesture of foregoing his salary and offering to charity. Yet the gentleman occupying the office at present betrays his true character by providing a $160,000 annual salary to his mother-in-law for watching his kids. Can you say CORRUPTION.
Progressive need to spend their valuable time cleaning up their own party instead of inventing false narratives about GOP picks
Personal Best Regards:
|
Every time you post the bogus mother-in-law story, it changes. Sometimes the president pays it and sometimes it is a pension.
What difference would it make to anybody if Obama paid his m-I-l for babysitting? Where is the illegality?
However, if he paid her $160,000 per year don't you think he would take that as a tax deduction as it is a substantial sum? Nowhere on the Obama's tax returns (dating back to his time in the IL senate) is there a child care deduction of this size. Check it out. The Obama's tax returns are on-line for the past 30 years.
If you are contending, the $160,000 bogus amount was paid by taxpayers, remember it is the house of representative (currently in GOP hands) that controls the purse strings, and this includes all expenses related to the White House.