Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
The difference is Petraeus pled guilty to mishandling classified material and was sentenced to two years probation, fired from his job as director of the CIA, and stripped of a few ranks.
Hillary Clinton was never charged with any crime even after a one year FBI investigation. Can you imagine the outrage if classified documents were found under the floor boards of the attic floor in the Clinton's home like they were at Petraeus' home, and then he lied about them to the FBI?
Another interesting point about Petraeus' probation, he is not allowed to handle any classified material. How can anyone be sec of state without handling classified material?
|
No, Clinton was not YET charged. And she did hide classified, only on her illegal server. And where Patraeus had confidential information, Hitlery had Top Secret, Secret and Confidential documents, along with captioned and code word material on her server and allowed uncleared personnel access to it. Not only should she lose her clearance for ANY gov information, but she should be in jail. Her not being in jail does not prove that she is innocent of breaking felony laws. It means that no one has charged and convicted her yet. Al Capone was only charged with a tax violation because they did not have enough evidence to prove his guilt. He would not be in the history books if he was just convicted of tax fraud. He was a felonious criminal just like Hillary.
Romney should not be trusted with such a high position in this administration. His loyalty has already been lacking.
Petraeus should not be trusted with this position because he is a convicted violator of national security law.
There are thousands if not millions of people in the U.S. that are far better choices for the job.