I think it would be interesting to hear both sides to make an informed opinion. I also think that talking like vigilantes is not useful. Turn all that negative energy into finding out if there are alternate locations and options to continue the good work of the Life Long Learning College. 32 people coming together for a lawsuit may have some legitimacy in their complaints. For heaven sakes, I read on TOTV and Facebook when people write flipping their lids that the grass is brown on the golf courses. Or they do not have the department stores they love. Or that people park poorly. Or that there is not enough variety in restaurants. Or that there is too much music at a swimming pool. Or people are stealing seats in the square. Or they don't like the parking at the hospital. Or they didn't like their doctor. On and On. I do not know what these 32 people were thinking or going after, but they must have had a passion and belief for their issues. Maybe it is not monetary. How do you know? Instead of being threatening about what you would like to do with these plaintiffs, it would be interesting to have them interviewed and given a chance to express what their issues were to go to the extent they did. I would like to know before I form an opinion for or against them or The Villages. Don't take as the gospel everything you read in the newspaper controlled by The Villages, broaden your scope and get all the facts. Maybe The Villages are in the right, but maybe the plaintiffs have some rights as well that were violated. No one knows at this time. I am curious too but non judgemental until I hear the "other" side.
|