Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Because it is not necessary to deprive 18,000+ Villagers an amenity that you and 32 others cannot enjoy----but you certainly could have if you had reached a compromise with the LLLC instead of running to your big city lawyers like a whiny little 3 year old brat. That's WHY
|
Looks like the lawyers in the case do work for the hearing impaired and the plaintiff listed first is a big advocate for the rights of the deaf. Look at his credentials on his Facebook page. They had probably worked together in the past. I do not believe a compromise would have been reached between these two -- the first plaintiff and the Villages' corporation. Both would have stood their ground at whatever the cost to the community at large.
Louis Schwarz --
Quote:
Deaf Advocacy Consultant at Deaf Advocate
President at Tri-County Association of the Deaf
Senior Tax Preparer at DeafTax.com
DeafBowTie
Former Board Member, East Region at GUAA - Gallaudet University Alumni Association
Former Chemist at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Studied at Gallaudet University
Went to Lane Tech College Prep
Lives in The Villages, Florida
From Chicago, Illinois
|