Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725
I spent ten days at BYU Law School in 1982. Was there on a Merit Scholarship for non-Mormons. Dropped out. Then went to get speech training at the University of Nevada, Reno. And journeyed to the University of Denver to get a MA in Librarianship and Information Management in May of 1984. Eventually went back to law school at the U of MN (Class of 1989) to become a law librarian and fight for more practical materials in libraries for victims/survivors of crimes of all kinds. A struggle I have had to do since mid 1991 from outside of law librarianship looking in after the powers that be blacklisted me. Mainly so that the money could keep coming into these big law firms who have control of the conversation along with the conservatism of the legal profession. I had to enlist everyone I could think of to change that conversation by bringing in people from many disciplines and many walks of life. Movie stars, writers, comedians, singers, celebrities, scholars, social workers, psychiatrists, CEOs, victim/witness assistance providers, police, etc. My main motivation in this was to help survivors/victms of crimes due to a long history of personal experiences with victims/survivors of crimes. I have communicated with a lot of lawyers since 1991 about this work and with some who have been real a-holes about this; many have not. For instance, some of my fellow Law Student Class of 1989 members have not been all that friendly. And some incredibly creative hurdles have been thrown up against me over the past almost 26 years.
|
Wow, I am completely overwhelmed and confused! I admit to everyone I am new at this, but I spent hours reading every posting.
What I was able to absorb was that this started out as the LLC being closed down by 32 malcontent deaf people. Then it changed to it being voluntarily dismembered. Then everyone in the world chipped in with their own ideas on the matter with no ownership to facts. Now it has morphed into a, I am a lawyer and your not, so it seems, and a history from birth conception to current times of a lawyer. How about all the lawyers offering verbiage to these threads enter the case as "friends of the court?" Maybe it is too late?
Is this what these threads are supposed to be? I said
I was confused! Why can't they be utilized by informing others of a problem and offering solutions. The use of FACTS should be the prerequisite. Of course opinions can be/should be used, but they should be noted at being opinion.
Again, I am completely confused. All of the above is my opinion.