Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725
We do not have the facts though with respect to what kind of reasonable accommodations were made by the developer and their staff and/or employees for the deaf. These battles though often just involve the clash of egos of lead people who will not compromise over petty details. Two narcissists in a room spend too much time looking for mirrors so to speak.
|
Tal; I agree with what you say. My only point is that something triggered the need to adjudicate this case. I also agree with the imprecision of application of "reasonable accommodations. The Villages television station was not equipped with close caption. Was it unreasonable for the plaintiffs to ask for said accommodation when in point of law it is clear that close captioning should have been provided. This local station carries information of all sorts entertainment safety issue warnings etc important to the community.
My other point is that there continues to be character assassination against the plaintiffs. I would perhaps agree if the claims filed had no merit but I am not privy to the goings on in this filing and like most people getting just hearsay information
The owners of these properties often takes their entire staff island hopping. So, even absent the law, is it unreasonable that they take a small portion of their profits for such accommodations.
Once again I'm not taking sides the applicable laws and the facts of this case will decide its ultimate outcome as to what is legal, moral and just