Originally Posted by Guest

Why is the belief that if something is removed there is no intent to fill the void or provide something better?

There is a plus to the government being out of it.

They will not be able to "borrow" from it AGAIN.
They would not be able to just bring in thousands or millions and give them a free ride on our benefits.

I know the snap back knee jerk commentary will be to crap all over such discussion.

However. How many have had their pension from a company they worked be disbanded and turned over to some fiduciary that honors the benefit every month like clock work? There was never a heartbeat missed during the transition.

So it would be helpful when folks are dissing all over a concept to present the action(s) in their entirety.....not just the bogey man side of it.

No I am not advocating eliminating anything...so take that twist away.

However I am open to listening to what, if anything is proposed.

OK....let er rip!!