Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
I keep reading the moronic logic of the Trumpists that if we remove California and New York from the popular vote then Trump wins!
Yeah, and if I remove the bananas from bananas foster I have a bonfire! What if we only count white men's votes? What if we only count the votes from historically red states? What if we only count women's votes? What if we only count votes from citizens with IQs above 100? What if we only count the votes of people who never read or watch the news?
WHAT? Who cares? California and New York are states with huge portions of the American population. I don't care about your feelings as to whether you agree with the citizens of those states or not. The facts (a concept that escapes the average Trumperina) is that Trump won the electoral college and Clinton won the popular vote. The majority of Americans did not vote for Lord L'Orange! He might win over some of us, but he isn't starting well with his lamebrain tweets, and the selection of billionaires and white nationalists as his cabinet and staff.
|
So...you think some states are more important than other states? CA has more electoral votes than 15 states. NY does the same, nullifying the votes of several states.
WHY should those 2 states be able to "Trump" 1/5th of the other states? Are blacks 3/5ths? Then why is Wyoming 1/15th of California? EACH state should get 1 vote and the first with 26 wins. The states like CA and NY have VERY large minority populations, minorities that shouldn't really be voting because they're net drains. And besides, a state is a state, each should get EQUAL representation...right? Or do you think some states ARE better than others?
Answer carefully...because if you say CA and NY SHOULD count more than the other "lesser" states...then 90% of blacks 80% of Hispanics...should NOT be voting because they're NOT "equal" to whites. The NEED for affirmative action and quotas proves it.
One person one vote. One state one electoral vote.