[QUOTE=Guest]I said this on the Assange thread. I would not defend Trump, Assange, Hannity, Putin, Obama, etc
My issue with the 17 national intelligence agencies is that they missed 9/11, WMD, Arab Spring, Benghazi, ISIS, Hillary's personal server and deal making with foreign nationals and failed to bring an indictment against her despite an explanation that in fact said they did have sufficient cause.
So as respects whether Putin did or did not hack the DNC I am not going to listen until they show they have returned to competency
Do you recall the Aug 6, 2001 PDB titled Bin Laden determined to attack the US? They didn't miss it, it was just ignored by W Bush.
They never said there were WMD in Iraq. That was the spin put on it by Cheney and his merry band of neo-cons. Many, many books have been written.
The intelligence community does not bring indictments. They provide information.
Where do you suggest that Trump get his intel from when the nuclear warhead is heading for Seattle? Assuange?
BTW: Are you familiar with the mafia guy Trump spent New Year's Eve with being that you are pure Italian?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
And by the way...if he felt that way, a decent person would say it privately AFTER being briefed, and not mock them in public, then add an endorsement of Assange and more defense of Putin.
|
Any decent, respectful, dignified person would say 'I'll wait to see the intelligence report before making remarks'. We know that none of those words are in Trump's vocabulary.