View Single Post
 
Old 01-08-2017, 06:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Alright, you're going to have to help me. I've looked through this thread twice and I fail to see any link or reference to a "Google Search" to which you reference that buries the a$$ of me or anyone else who posits the initial point, which was:

The GOP is poised to repeal the ACA without any clear replacement and that is bad policy.

Perhaps I am mistaken, and if so you might be so kind as to direct me to that Google Search or post a link to it once again. And if I'm wrong then I apologize, but I feel compelled to state that even if my a$$ is buried, that is much preferable to showing my a$$ with unsubstantiated arguments.

The link to the article you posted, which made the point that "spending on health care per capita in the U.S. is greater than all other OECD countries" was good and provided me some insight. In fact I'll share some additional quotes from that same article as well:


"There were 32 million uninsured Americans in 2014, nine million fewer than the year prior. Experts attribute this sharp decline in the uninsured to the full implementation of the ACA in 2014. Of American adults who had health insurance in 2014, 73 percent had one or more full-time workers in the family and 12 percent had one or more part-time workers in the family. Just 49 percent of American adults reported getting health insurance from an employer in 2014.

Coverage by employer-provided insurance varies considerably by wage level. Firms with higher proportions of low-wage workers are less likely to provide access to health insurance than those with low-proportions of low-wage workers.

In 2014, 11.2 percent of full-time workers were without health insurance. However, the percentage of part-time workers without insurance was 17.7 percent, a significant decrease from 24 percent in 2013, thanks in part to the Affordable Care Act. The uninsured rate among those who had not worked at least one week also decreased from 22.2 percent in 2013 to 17.3 percent in 2014.

Smaller firms are significantly less likely to provide health benefits to full or part-time workers. Among all small firms (3-199 workers) in 2015, only 56 percent offered health coverage, compared to 98 percent of large firms.

After the Affordable Care Act allowed for many young adults (19-25) to remain on their parents’ health plans, there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of insured young people from 68.3 percent in 2009[31] to 82.9 percent in 2014. Over the same period, the percentage of young people aged 26-34 with insurance increased from 70.9 percent to 81.8 percent.

Minorities and children are disproportionately uninsured. In 2014, 7.6 percent of non-Hispanic Whites were uninsured, 11.8 percent of Blacks were uninsured, 9.3 percent of Asians, and 19.9 percent of people of Hispanic origin were uninsured. The Kaiser Family Foundation has found that about 80 percent of the uninsured are U.S. citizens. Among children, six percent were uninsured in 2014. These children are 10 times more likely than insured children to have unmet medical needs and are five times as likely as an insured child to go more than two years without seeing a doctor.

Women in the individual market often faced higher premiums than men for the same coverage. Beginning in 2014, the Affordable Care Act banned this practice, as well as denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

In 2014, 19.3 percent of the population living below 100 percent of the poverty line ($23,550 a year for a family of four) was uninsured. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 90 percent of the uninsured have family incomes within 400 percent of the federal poverty level. This makes them eligible for either subsidized coverage through tax credits or expanded Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act’s state health exchanges."
The post in question might be in another thread...you did not respond to it, not worth the effort to look for it.

Thanks for all that meaningless information that you dragged out of the document I linked. If I ever need someone to pre read the newspaper for me and decide what I need to focus on you will be at the top of my thoughts.

You got so excited with the information, you never responded to my questions or comments...

To summarize all the data you have compiled:

There were more people that got healthcare because many no longer had the choice to not have it. The poor already had health care thru Medicaid.

Your data does not tell me how to get my health care back to an affordable rate. In fact it infers that you and the rest of the Dems are on a crusade to give people too lazy to work, or too stupid to find a job, heath care. All the while the piece of $hit is smoking cigarettes, drinking liquor, doing drugs, and over eating. They don't care about themselves, and I don't care enough about those people to pay for their health care.

If you feel so sorry for them, and want to pay for their health care, do it with your own money!

Go ahead impress us with all the charitable donations you have given to people that have no health care...