Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Libtards attack their new president and then blame the RIGHT for reminding them of their loss. Sounds like libtards are in denial.
Trump accepts Intelligence reports and rather than relying on their analysis/opinions on the reports, makes up his own theory. Clapper admitted that he does not like Trump. Clapper is an Obie man and will say whatever he feels like saying. I have worked with several Intel agencies and I know that the bosses have their own agenda about how information is analyzed.
Trump did not deny that Russia hacks us. He knows that Russia has been hacking us for 40+ years and that we also hack other countries. That is the Intel game. Been there. Even Clapper had to admit that NOTHING that the Russian hacking did had swayed the election. This is just another excuse by Obie for his shameful and pitiful defeat when he threw himself 100% into Hillary's corner. And I have no doubt that he did this to protect his legacy plus his culpability in Hillary's scandal.
Now Obie is in a bad spot. If he pardons her before he leaves office, he has to admit that she is a criminal that he endorsed and campaigned for. If he doesn't pardon her, she may bring him down when she is indicted. I bet ole Barrack is sweating rubber bullets right now.
|
I'm a bit confused about this. People are saying that Russia hacked "us". Who exactly is "us".
From what I understand, they hacked the e-mails of the DNC. As far as I know none of the parties are an arm of the U.S. government. So did they actually hack the government or a government server? If a foreign government hacked my e-mail server, would that be considered hacking "us"?
If some 14 year old kid in the next town hacks my e-mail server is that an issue for the U.S. government to get into?
Did Russia actually hack any government sites? And if they did, who is responsible for the security of those sites and why aren't they being talked about?