Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
I said the event was written twice . Apparently no one knows for sure that is alive and willing to talk about it.
However we have learned that Assad had hidden his cache of poisons well until he used them on his was able to successfully hide people. We know Saddam was able to successfully hide aircraft in the desert and we know that Saddam openly used chemical weapon against the Kurds We know WMD can fit in a military truck and be transported easily.
All I am suggesting is that Saddam had plenty of time to moved every trace of his WMD given Bush's delay in moving forward with his plan to go into Iraq .
Washington people are forced to say no WMD because it is difficult to disprove a negative
Personal Best Regards
|
You don't KNOW that ANY of that was true...you saw it on the "news" and the "news" is often faked.
Maybe...and maybe not. Again, you heard it on the "news".
Unless you're standing there watching...you don't KNOW what happened. You "know" what you were told by someone else. What agenda could they have?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Exactly. The one question that no liberal has been able to answer, other than denial is; if there were no WMDs in Iraq, how do they explain away those thousands of bodies in mass graves of people killed by gas?
|
Again...you saw bodies on the "news"...it could be true or it could be false. The government/media lies a lot.
We really can't know what is true and what isn't.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
What a ridiculous post. Even George Bush and Dick Cheney admit there were no weapons of mass destruction. The only idiot saying otherwise is Sean Hannity and we all know what a nutjob he is.
|
In this we agree...he's an obvious shill.