Originally Posted by Guest

There are some truths that are universally accepted. In nature one is that day follows night and night is followed by day world wide.

When it comes to society universal truths become majority truths and contingent on social mores, customs, usage etc.

In this nation and in my life time infidelity was once believed to be a dishonorable endeavor by a majority. However mores from then to now have radically changed. Yet......today

Infidelity by a spouse may or may not cause one to furrow their brow. However if we present that same scenario with the added feature that the spouse being betrayed was on his/her death bed chances are a vast majority of onlookers would cringe.

Another universal truth is that people react in the negative toward other people who will not take responsibility for their own failed acts, blaming others; except if it occurs in the political arena.

This is the exact situation pertaining to the failure of Hillary Clinton to seize the presidential nomination. Hillary and company and progressives in general have not and will not come to terms as to why Hillary failed. They continue creating boogie men.

The Russian hacking canard is the most outrageous and untrue but even if true was Hillary's fault anyway.

Russia hacked Hillary's personal e-mail server and she continued utilizing it even after warnings by the FBI. So the nation;s leaders, including Hillary knew and had known for sometime that Russia had penetrated our system and hence forewarned is forearmed. As a sidebar in my personal view Edward Snowden provided the key that opened the door to the serious hacking conducted by Russia

Progressives in turn also blamed Comey's action because of his on again off again behavior. The truth of the matter is that objective observers understood the politics of Comey's motivation (ie pressure coming from the White House.) Neither was it lost on objective observers that Comey could not serve two masters but there he was doing so by creating a factious burden of proof as a means of a red herring.

And it was not lost on objective observers that the information hacked on the DNC servers was factual and did not bode well for Hillary and company. Referring to my above remarks of forewarned why didn't the DNC effect better firewalls as did the RNC who experienced attempts but failed hacks.? And why would Hillary people be so irresponsible as to make such admission on their e-mail when a first grader knows the internet is anything but private.

We add to those situation a dismissal Obama legacy and a rejections of the progressive party platform and we have a recipe for failure.

For the record I would suggest the same objective analysis of Trump and Company. Personally I find fault with his childish tweets every time his feelings get hurt. He must remain above the fray as every president has his pit bulls to do his dirty work. Its a failing on his part and a major distraction. Let his press secretary spank the liberal media and Hollywood divas.

Personal Best Regards: