Originally Posted by Guest

Did you read post 19 ? The post where both of us were referenced ? I do not post generalities. If I disagree with you I will be specific. YOUR NAME was taken in post 19, but you knew that because you read it all. I suggest that you appear to be a VERY SELECTIVE reader. I suggest you avoid anything of substance unless it can be turned into an attack on other large groups.

I am not a "poor devil" as you refer to me and am not "chasing ghosts". I responded DIRECTLY to post 19.

In addition, I mentioned, not by name because they were not mentioned by name in post 19, others like you who avoid issues and attempt to turn everything into some attack on others.

Example, I do not like Trump, but have made it clear that I agree with the basis of his EO, and suggested based on factual reading how he might succeed.

I WILL ASK YOU SINCE YOU DIRECTLY ACCUSED ME OF WHAT YOU CALL FAKE NEWS. PLEASE BE SPECIFIC IN YOUR CHARGE. WHEN I ACCUSED YOU OF PLAGARISM TWICE, I SUPPLIED LINKS..WHEN YOU COPIED FROM RUSSIAN FAKE NEWS SITES, I GAVE THE LINKS SO PEOPLE COULD SEE. WHEN YOU ACCUSED, USING MADE UP STORIES ABOUT CNN REPORTING, I SUPPLIED LINKS AND INFORMATION TO YOU. PLEASE DO THE SAME FOR ME.

Of course, but every single response from you is the same...it NEVER changes. You twist until you can lecture (NOT DISCUSS) in the evils of ALL progressives.

Your un yielding defense of Trump is legend. You are silent on Trumps criticism of members of the judicial...you are silent on his public critique of Nordstrom...facts is, no matter the issue, you will defend him and his group, no matter what, and then jump into a lecture condemning many millions of Americans that you label as one.

Your even commenting on Ivanka Trumps looks is offensive and personal. Unless I missed it, younstand alone in making her looks some kind of issue.

I cannot wait to hear your defense of Gen. Flynn, or any lie told by the White House.