Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
since you label your thread CNN I'll stay to that issue.
CNN tactics are below contempt and by any measure they fail the ethical standards of journalistic reporting.
What causes me to furrow my brow is one someone comes to their defense. Why? because they end up with some manner of moral equivalency or moral relativism.
and I say to myself you are either ethical or you are unethical. To equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute.
Personal Best Regards:
|
A few responses....
Since you say "to equivocate that A is more unethical than B does not compute"...... does that apply to your rants about ALL progressives ? Or even your comparisons of Presidents ?
Also, as an avid reader and follower of the news, could you supply specific examples to back up your claim. Thank you.
You big words do not disguise that you said NOTHING of value or substance. Easy to come on here and condemn anyone or anything if your conscience allows to to then simply move n without any credence given
Not defending CNN' but you said "CNN tactics are below contempt...."
That sort of requires you to prove something like that.
I will not hold my breath, because youbare not in the habit of EVER backing up your many many accusations.