Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Forbes Welcome
"Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election."
And there still is no proof that there was any Russian influence in the Trump-Clinton campaigns. But, the leftards are still complaining about a rumor, and they still demand his tax returns.
|
If we knew this in 1984, then it should have been investigated fully and appropriate actions taken, just as we should do with the allegations today about the Trump Campaign and Russia. And thanks again for the name calling, which is the desperate and pathetic fall back position when one has no facts or rational thought to back up their opinion. If you are advocating that we ignore these allegations from the CIA and FBI, then are you suggesting that Russian interference in our elections is OK and should be accepted? Democrats are not saying that the allegations are right or wrong. They are saying that they should be investigated, maybe with the same vigor with which we wasted millions investigating Benghazi.