[Muncle]

Let's see. Kahuna's vile disgusting attack on the POA consisted of:

"That's surely the way it appears to me. In fact, I don't think I know any grumps.

Whoops! I forgot the POA!"

I kinda interpreted that as meaning Kahuna thought the POA was negative in many of their views and had a reputation as such. Whether one agrees with their various actions, be they siding, stopping One Sumter, fixing the hospital system, or passing a constitutional amendment, can anyone possibly deny they are negative toward the developer and Villages management in general? At least one definition of grumpy is "annoyed and irritable." Does that not describe the attitude of the POA in many of it's actions? The POA members of the lawsuit did not split $350,000 because they were ecstatic and compliant.

But then, it doesn't really matter whether Kahuna was accurate in his depiction of the POA and more than whether Z was accurate in his attack on the Daily Sun. Anyone is more that welcome to take exception to what is said and to attempt to refute it. But to attack someone for having the opinion and accuse them of being mean, insulting, or disrespectful is the epitome of petty.

--- remember, this is only an opinion and is philosophical in nature -- no personal attacks whatsoever.