Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Rep Schiff offers little in substance but provides for high drama displaying his ability to flim flam the public.
Schiff feigns indignation about Devin Nunes methods but he knows Nunes was doing his job, and he well knows Nunes spent years cultivating whistleblowers and sources as a part of his oversight responsibilities otherwise such information would remain hidden.
All this drama to deep six the important information Nunes uncovered wherein Obama surveilled the incoming administration on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia and unmasked transition officials. This is a crime.
the documents shown Nunes at a secured facility revealed:
dozens of documents with information about Trump officials,
these documents were NOT related to Russia
clearly what Trump officials were unmasked (identified)
In other words Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration
Schiff also misrepresents Nunes meeting place. Schiff knows
congress members MUST VIEW classified materials on executive-branch grounds because that's the only way to physically access it
Finally, as to the allegation that Nunes secretively wanted to tip off the White House consider Nunes
has an obligation to let the White House know as he couldn't sit on it,
activity by democrats prevented him from going there because they would have leaked it and twisted this story their modus operandi since Trump entered the race.
Nunes held press briefings before and after his meeting with Trump to be transparent.
if Nunes only purposed was to "tip off"Trump about a Russia probe he cold have easily and secretly called Steve Bannon from his office
Schiff is wasting taxpayers money.
Personal Best Regards:
|
I will say this in the nicest possible way, because your post is total garbage and appears to have come from that binder on Sean Spicer's podium.
Please get you facts and stop embarrassing yourself with posts like this.
You are now in a FACT FREE ZONE....or an alternate universe.
...the only thing you left out from the various Trump sites was Evelyn Farkas.
YOU KNOW NO FACTS WHATSOVER. Nor do I. I just am not as "taken" with myself or Donald Trump. I offer what might be happening andnyou actuallyncome on TOTV and present us with the White House version in "sermon" form.
It IS embarrassing to see people totally ignore facts at hand
Hate to say it, but your post is incorrect, incomplete, and very ill informed.
My response is not to condemn Trump....do not know enough, but you are not even in the ballpark.
Did you miss the part about WHY the documents mentioned Trump, and why they even existed ? Try looking into that.
Also as serious as unmasking can be...what you leaders are not telling you is how normal the practice it is, and under what circumstances there were.
You did a worse job than Spicer.
I do need to be clear. Unmasking under certain circumstances is terrible. It appears that the unmasking took place from surveillance of Russians who mentioned Trump, or his aides in conversation. I, obviously, do not know for sure, but it appears that was the case. One example, and I'm making this up. Intelligence officials while wire tapping hear information mentioning candidate Trump, mask the reference at that point. That done prior to investigations involving Russia. Seems plausible, once the story unwinds that Trumps name should be unmasked to determine what we are dealing with. Again, I am making that all up, but something like that would fit with the story of Comey coming to,Obama with either the mask on or off and then Obama feels if the fact of Russia interfering were released, it WOULD influence the election so insures it is not public.
I don't know, but you are on the Trump train...talk about unmasking and ignore Russian ties, etc.
Honestly, at this point. I do not believe Trump directly colluded with Russia. He is scared that people will find out how reckless and immature he is with the charge of wiretap, and how he was played by the Russians, that this is his coverup. Thus far, Nukes has lied, Spicer has lied for him. You didn't even mention the Farkas incident which may play big...either an American hero or traitor. Once the hearings can get on we shall see.
Just know that your post is what Trump wants....diversion...talk about unmasking. I would ask you to review some of the open testimony thus far, which details the ease in which Trump was played by Russia.