Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
|
The story you linked to from "The Smithsonian Institution"...MUST have been written/checked by one of the quota holders I'm always rallying against. I can't believe this error got through:
"History of Discovery:
Unlike every other
human species, Homo sapiens does not have a true type specimen. In other words, there is not a particular Homo sapiens individual that researchers recognize as being the specimen that gave Homo sapiens its name."
The CORRECT phrase SHOULD read..."species"...just plain species. They ALL have "the example", the "perfect" example of what they species is. Or, is it a Freudian slip? And they MEANT to say that there are different "human species"?
There isn't a "perfect human example" because the races are actually different species by we can't say that. So, we MUST lump different species together and hence, it's impossible to find/describe the perfect example.
"Below are some of the still unanswered questions about Homo sapiens that may be answered with future discoveries:
Who was our direct evolutionary ancestor? Was it Homo heidelbergensis, like many paleoanthropologists think, or another species?
How much interbreeding occured between our species and Homo neanderthalensis?
What does the future hold for our species in an evolutionary sense? "
We MAY have come from the same ancestor...some evidence suggests we didn't...but AFTER we split, we each became VERY different.
Whites/Asians bred with other Homo species...Negros did NOT. It's what makes us VERY different. We ARE hybrids, they are not.
We are NOT the same genetically and the LACK of the "perfect" human is ALL political.
We need to REVERSE immigration or the country is lost...there is no other solution. The "illegal" anchor babies MUST be deported. Hispanics ARE the majority of children being born, they have been the last 7 years...in 30 years or less they WILL be the absolute majority...there is nothing to stop it short of deportation.
If your policy is ANYTHING short of that, it will be ineffective and only prolong the inevitable.
We'll have drinks and talk about it...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Read some old books people always thought things would fall apart.
I have or had a book that predicted the bicycle would ruin the world with women getting out on them. Is it easier to go parking on a bike or a horse? They did not cover that topic.
I have another book trying to sell electric trucks in the early 1900's. Complete with graphs, you have to have graphs to proove how bad it is. This book predicted that in NYC based on the amount that comes out of horse's EXHAUST, in ???? ten years the streets of NYC would be manure to your waist..
The world was supposed to end with the fuel shortage.
Fuel was wood and Europe had already burned a large part of what they had. Wood was a major export from the US to Europe. For the US lumber was so abundant they were thrilled to be able to sell it to europe so as to get rid of it to open up the land for farming. As wood got more expensive due to demand, a switch was made to coal.
In WWI England switched to oil as it was becoming cheaper and perhaps more important the exhaust from the boilers was not as easily seen. Pollution was not the issue being visible to enemy ships was.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY? WHY DO YOU NOT SEE WHAT IS RIGHT WITH THIS COUNTRY. IF, YOU LIKE MOST LIBERALS THINK THERE IS A BETTER PLACE WHY ARE YOU STILL HERE?
|
I did read "old books" and in EVERY one of them...when a country brought in more and more foreigners...eventually they lost their identity and no longer existed. They became what the foreigners were.
Your "examples" don't compare at all.
Horsesh!t WAS a HUGE problem in NYC...a HUGE problem...it was EVERYWHERE. Dead horses was a problem too. With so many in the city at all times, there were lots to collect.
The wood was used to make charcoal also used in making metals...
Coal was used when MACHINES were created to mine it efficiently. Slavery ended because of machines too...don't be fooled by the fake "his-story" in most books.
Oil became popular...again...because machines could be built to get it efficiently.
The "common history" is propaganda...it changes depending on who is in charge.