|
04-20-2017, 05:56 PM
|
|
Veteran member
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: MI, LA, IN, IL, MI (2), MA, NC, CA (2)A, FL, VA, RI, NH, OR (2), FL (2), WI (2), MN
Posts: 543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Challenger
The case I cited occurred under Pres O not Pres T.
I imagine that this was normal administrative follow up, not part of the newly instigated process. (just trying to be fair)
|
Correct. It was likely that their tax forms showed they were not employing two people as required by their Special Visas.
|