Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Copuff
Being a woman might be considered as a handicap. Not good to start with a sexist statement Dirt!
Lets see your math on the 17 billion... not my math that number came from a Washington Post story and was only for 10 years. Here is another link for you!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/u...bill.html?_r=0
I believe you meant to say pre existing conditions are covered unless the state decides to opt out...what's a matter, don't you trust the state politicians that were elected by the residents of the state??
Seriously??? Did you see that gathering at the White House it was a bunch of old frat boys. They are NOT is the business of looking out for the middle class or the poor!
COPUFF |
Hey now - you started down the sexist path with "being a woman is a pre existing condition", I just took it a little further. Odd that it bothered you, if you made a sexist statement about men, nobody would care...
I looked at your link...no mention of 17 billion in ten years. Again, I will ask you to share your math.
Yes, I am serious. Pre existing coverage is included in the bill, the states can opt out. Why do you believe a state would opt out? Why do you believe the elected officials of the state only look out for the rich? Do you vote with that opinion toward all that are running? Seems cynical...