Originally Posted by Guest

"The Fourth US Circuit of Appeals ( in International Refugee Assistant Project v Trump) defies supreme Court precedent and engages in policy that the Constitution plainly reserves to the president and Congress ............

The controlling case is Kleindienst v Mandel (1972) .........
The Supreme Court concluded from that case
1) aliens have no constitutional right to enter the US
2) Americans have no Constitutional right to demand entry for aliens
3) the decision to deny admission to an alien must be upheld f it is based on a facially legitimate and bona fide reason.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed Mandel with Fiallo v BELL (1977) and Kerry v Din (2015)

David Rivkin, Jr, & Lee Casey practice Appellate and Adminstrative Law In Washington DC.

The authors conclude the Judges for the Fourth Circuit
are engaged in the judicial equivalent of "the resistance"

P.S. To the radical left its resistance but to the majority of the nation it is the garden variety obstruction

Personal Best Regards: