Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chazz
Although just an "advisory opinion," the Florida State Attorney General's written opinion I mentioned a few messages above (click on the link that I cited) seems to support Collection6. Although it doesn't make a distinction between commercial or residential traffic, it supports the rights of the public to travel on public streets.
|
I read the FAG Opinion and I agree that it supports the right of the "public" to travel on public streets. Since it does not distinguish between commercial and residential traffic, I would argue that the "public" includes both residential and commercial traffic, i.e., it is inclusive not exclusive; also, the signs posted do not distinguish between residential and commercial traffic.
FWIW, one of the concerns expressed by Commissioner Mast is how can the county issue a ticket merely for the offense of driving on a "public" street.
My. $.02...
John