Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
While I am not enamored by the POA I can tell you unequivocally that they are not biased against the Developer. if you review their long history they have made every attempt to work with the Developer in a desire to provide relief to residents. Any resident believing that the POA does not have a genuine interest in working on behalf of residents is mistaken
My criticism of the POA is that their ability to do anything is very limited either by design of our goverment or unwillingness to be more risk takers.
The TVHOA was financed by the Developer specifically to compete with the POA. If the Developer were 12th Century England and the POA Scotland then the HOA was designed to be the equivalent of droit du seigneur  Sorry couldn't help myself.
In some respects the philosophy of all that is owned or controlled by the Developer fits the profile of a nursing home where that generations music is blasted throughout the facility and the news is always sanitized so as not to upset its residents most of whom lean toward and prefer nostalgia...to wit the Daily Sun |
The HOA doesn't even own the trademark to their own logo - it's owned by the developer.