Originally Posted by Guest

I find it quite funny that the left is still in denial about the guilt of Hillary. There is so much evidence that is availible on the Inernet, including her own testimony, that only someone in complete denial would ignore it. I have listed time and time again all the federal statutes that she has violated. I have listed testimony and her statements under oath. It is not the public's fault if congress was too weak to follow up on the evidence and that the last administration was too corrupt to indict based on obvious evidence of crimes committed. Shoot, we have crimes committed and no special prosecutor for Hillary's malfeasance, but on the other hand one for suspicion that something may have occurred, but no evidence when it comes to election tampering. The left is perfectly able to excuse Hillary because they have no one else to represent their side, with enough Soros backing to provide them with a power base. They do not care about her corruption. They have never cared about corruption on their side. On the other hand, the right will clean their own house when there is evidence of corruption.

So, before screaming that Hillary is not guilty because no one has charged her, remember how our system works. She has not been indicted YET, so she has not been found innocent or not guilty. She just hasn't been charged or convicted yet. That can still happen. Just because one administration was too corrupt to indict her on obvious evidence that she committed felonies, does not mean that someone else can't indict her.